Campaign Finance Reports, July 15 mid-year

Note: Most candidates are continuing to carry balances, which could signal a willingness to run again. City staff tell me that mayoral candidate Donna Woodfork did not file a mid-year report.

Former candidates maintaining contributions:
Brendan Carroll
David Zoltner

Place 6:
Greg Johnson

Place 5:
Hatice Salih
Dalton Gregory

District 2:
Glenn Farris
John Ryan

Jean Schaake

Chris Watts

Ice Bucket Challenge, Texas-style

Watch an entire backhoe of water rain down on the City Council, who was challenged by Mayor Chris Watts.

We don’t get to hear who they challenged here. I was told by Assistant City Manager John Cabrales they put out a long list before the backhoe driver was ready to go: county commissioners, the city manager, the assistant city manager.


Frack ban opposition files campaign paperwork

Bobby Jones was one of two people who said they represented Denton Taxpayers for a Strong Economy when they delivered the plebiscite petition opposing a proposed ban on hydraulic fracturing in the city limits.

He filed paperwork with the Denton city secretary last week appointing himself as the treasurer for the group.

Taxpayers SPC Filing

A quick look at property tax records shows that the Jones Family Trust is listed as part owner of five wells on the west side of town, all currently operated by EagleRidge. They are the Jones-Nelson Unit, the Mason Unit, the Jones-Sorrells Unit, and Mayday-Lattimore 1H and 2H.

UPDATE: Here are copies of documents on file with the Texas Railroad Commission which show who else pooled on those units with the Jones family.

0165_001 (Mayday-Mason Units)

0164_001 (Mayday-Lattimore Units)

Denton Taxpayers for a Strong Economy list their official purpose as to “oppose the drilling ban proposition.”

Just to be clear, the proposition doesn’t ban drilling, but hydraulic fracturing. When the City Council approved the proposition for the ballot, they added language beyond what the initiative petition had proposed, one that appears to further the distinction between drilling and fracking.

Another day, another open records request: Convention Center edition

We’ll have a story tomorrow about new rumblings in the community over the convention center. There may be another petition circulating, this time to get the convention center bonds on the ballot. Meanwhile, the Denton Chamber of Commerce has sent out an email urging its members to contact the City Council to express their support of the project.

It took a couple of passes at the city to get these documents I’m posting below. Writing records requests feels like an art form sometimes. Over the years, I’ve learned it helps to know the name of the document you want to see. That’s easy when you want something like a petition or a campaign finance filing.

But when you only know the law or rule that requires the report, or the general principle of a business transaction, the request becomes more difficult to articulate.

I’ve spent more time than I care to admit stumbling in the dark looking for the vocabulary that unlocks the government filing cabinets, to wit: notification letters, lien waivers, or, in today’s case “schedule of values.” (And thanks to all you unnamed sources out there that help us reporters with our vocabulary.)


RFP 5546 Convention Center Pricing Detail.6.30.14

Open records requests for the frack ban petition

A few days ago, I made an open records request for a document I don’t typically ask for: copies of open records requests.

It seemed germane in this case, given the expected tenor of the upcoming battle over a potential ban on hydraulic fracturing in the city: who has asked for a copy of the citizen petition? In other words, who is making it their business to have on hand the nearly 2,000 names and contact information on that petition?

We might, as a news outlet, care about the names on the petition. Did any elected officials sign the petition? Did anyone’s dog sign the petition? I considered it for a minute or two and realized that would be a lot of work and hardly be worth even a blog post. Then, I realized there might be people who would want all those names and addresses. So, I requested letters of all those who had asked.

The answer turned out to be pretty interesting. PETITION REQUESTORS

The same day the petition was submitted, Bill Paxton of the Eppstein Group, in Fort Worth asked for it. Browse their website, note their clients. Interesting choice of a hired gun, if that’s their role.

So did Denton’s own Devin Taylor, who sits on the city’s planning and zoning commission. Taylor asked the city also for derived documents, kind of a I’m-from-Missouri-so-show-me request of the list of qualified signatures.

A month later, on June 9, a Jourdanton council member asked for a copy. According to her cover letter, that city appears to be considering a ban, too, in order to protect the aquifer.

Also on June 9, Robert Flores, a lobbyist in San Antonio, requested a copy of the proposed ordinance and petition.

For now, I’m not planning a full story — which would involved calling all these folks in hopes of finding out what they intend to do with the list of names and addresses. But in the interim, I’m offering this blog post to help keep the lights shining brightly on this issue for our community.

And to that end, know that I have again requested copies campaign finance paperwork with the city secretary. No one else has filed besides “Pass the Ban” and “Denton First,” which is the liquor petition. The website, North Texans for Natural Gas, popped up between the time the petition was submitted and the council’s July 15 vote. For a time, it was unclear who was behind the online presence. It appeared to be well-funded, with many ads showing up in social media. Today, I noticed that the site listed Devon Energy, EnerVest, EOG Resources and XTO Energy as founders.



Ad hoc committee taking shape

Council members Greg Johnson, Kevin Roden and John Ryan all expressed an interest in working on an ad hoc committee that would take a fresh look at the city’s nearly 35-year-old ordinance on historic preservation.

The council discussed whether to form the committee during a workshop session over lunch today in the training room of the city’s facilities building.

Mayor Chris Watts sought reassurance that the council’s intent in visiting the issue was not to undermine the Historic Landmark Commission. He was not on City Council when many issues emerged with the commission and the prospect of an ad hoc committee was raised (see stories here and here and here and here and here), but he was on council when the body moved to disband its airport board. Past councils had earned a reputation of interfering with the work of its boards and commissions, he said.

Council member Kevin Roden said he believed a council committee could help the commission better get about its business of historic preservation by addressing issues in the old ordinance.

The council is reviewing a draft resolution that it expects to consider on a consent agenda next month. Then, the council and commission will gather in a joint meeting in September or October to set an agenda for the council committee.


Legal opinions

In my first report from the public hearing on the frack ban, I was able to write a few sentences about the legal opinions being provided to the City Council, one from former Texas Supreme Court Justice Tom Phillips and the other from Jordan Yeager, at Curtin & Heefner.

Grab a cup of joe and see for yourself how different legal minds see the city’s battle to police what happens in its boundaries.

Phillips opinion

Yeager opinion

Frack ban: Flyers, flyers everywhere

Residents both in and outside of Denton reported receiving flyers about Denton’s vote tomorrow night on the proposed ban on hydraulic fracturing. (This is in addition to reports that residents are being asked to sign a plebiscite petition that ostensibly opposes the ban, although an increasing number of residents tell us they were mislead by the petition workers about the meaning of the petition.)

Here’s a copy of what’s shown up on Denton doorsteps.

The website registration for Clean Resources has been made private, but the group likely has ties to the Barnett Shale Energy Education Council (BSEEC), a longstanding industry-funded effort. A handful of people from Fort Worth came sporadically to Denton City Council public hearings in the past few years and identified themselves as being from Clean Resources before stating their opposition to revised oil and gas development rules. The director of BSEEC, Ed Ireland, served on the city’s task force in the re-writing of those rules.

In addition, mineral owners in several nearby cities report receiving this letter in the mail, urging them to come to the Denton City Council meeting Tuesday.

The meeting begins at 6:30 p.m. The city staff are preparing for a crowd. Here is an advisory to help if you plan to attend.

Call to local royalty owners

Denton resident Shirley Price called me to say that she’d received a letter from the Texas Royalty Council urging her to call her city leaders to oppose the proposed ban on hydraulic fracturing.

The public hearing on the ban is expected during the Denton City Council’s July 15 meeting.

Price called because she had not seen mention of the council’s letter in our story about the latest petition in town seeking support of fracking.

The letter, which is posted on the council’s website, suggests that Denton may not be legally able to hold the frack ban election under its city charter. The letter also suggests a court injunction against such an election was possible. Neither the Texas Oil and Gas Association, the Texas Independent Producers and Royalty Owners Associations nor the many attorneys I have visited with have suggested this possibility.

For the record, the relationship between the longstanding TIPRO and the royalty council is unclear. The oldest entries on the council website date to 2008 — a little post-Barnett Shale boon, and more at the start of the Eagle Ford rush.

Price thought Denton mineral owners were getting these letters regardless of where their holdings were. She has holdings in Montague County. As such, a ban in Denton wouldn’t affect her mineral income.

The way the letter is written also makes it difficult for the reader to keep other facts straight. Denton’s proposed ban is not on drilling, but on fracking. The recent Dryden decision shows the argument over a city using its local powers to regulate (zoning, public health and safety) as a “regulatory taking” is far from settled.

The connection between a frack ban in Denton and local job loss is likely tenuous, since no oil and gas companies are based here. The connection between a frack ban in Denton and higher taxes is also tenuous, since both the city’s and school’s property tax base are far more diversified. In many meetings, I’ve watched the city staff plan for the obsolescence in mineral wealth at the airport.

Given the lack of transparency in the state budget, a claim about the impact on tuition needs to be examined for its full effects. The UNT System doesn’t have property holdings like UT. Some of the state’s severance tax goes into the rainy day fund, the rest goes into the general fund, which helps fund higher education.

As a call to action, Price told me she could appreciate the letter’s stance. I found it interesting that she also said that she didn’t think there should be fracking in the city limits, especially with emerging science on its impacts to drinking water and earthquakes.

Troubling testimony about child, adult protective services

I listened to most of the testimony during the Sunset Advisory Commission’s public hearings Wednesday to prepare for today’s report on the state supported living centers.

I heard testimony about other facets of human services in Texas during the course of the day — testimony from families whose cases revealed a troubling lack of accountability in the Department of Family and Protective Services.

A woman and her two sons testified to their year apart when a caseworker removed all of the woman’s children after one of her adoptive children died. The woman told the Senate panel that she agreed to take in her sister-in-law’s young children, who she thought were neglected. After they came into her care, she learned the true extent of their abuse, but the caseworker and the department did not come to her aid, she said. When one of the children died from complications of the abuse, the caseworker returned to remove all the children. The sons testified to the sexual abuse they suffered in the care of foster families and the mother testified to spending all her savings in order to get her children back.

By the end of the family’s testimony, an agency representative was at the table with them and acknowledged the commission members’ call for an internal and criminal investigation.

Commission members also called for the Texas Rangers to investigate after hearing testimony from several families about guardians-for-hire. Those families testified that after a complaint or dispute with Adult Protective Services, a new guardian would be appointed, limit the family member’s access and, over time, drain the loved one’s estate.

Nelson called those rounds of testimony “discouraging.”

Both days of testimony were broadcast on the web and are available online at